SEO Articles Home > SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION > Introduction to Search Engine Positioning > Myths and Truth about Optimization > Wading Through The Search Engine Myths
Wading Through The Search Engine Myths
by Scott Buresh
There is an abundance of search
engine information available on the web- some of it
valuable, much of it contradictory. Throughout the
years some prevailing search engine myths have developed.
Some of these myths are still encouraged by companies
with a financial interest in their continued existence.
Others are based upon techniques that were effective
years ago but no longer work. Still others come from
simple misunderstandings that inevitably come with
a relatively new medium. What follows is a few of
the most prevalent.
Myth: Using a
program or service to "Submit your site to 10,000
Search Engines" is a good idea.
Fact: There aren't
10,000 search engines. There aren't even 500. In fact,
the top 10 search engines account for the vast majority
of search traffic (studies vary from between 85 and
98 percent). Most of the sites that these programs
or services list as "search engines" are
called FFA (Free For All) sites, sometimes called
"link farms". These sites will agree to
place a link to your site on their site, which is
usually just a collection of links. Your link will
usually only appear for a short time, since as new
links are added, the older ones are pushed off the
page. Almost no traffic can be expected from such
links- but you can expect a lot of unsolicited mail
to the email address that you provide them. In fact,
these pages are set up largely to collect email addresses
to which spam can be sent (and you can get spam for
free!). In addition, engines do not like submissions
done by computer programs (because of the excessive
use of bandwidth and resources), and many of the most
popular have taken steps to make automated submission
impossible. This means that these programs or services
will not even get you listed in many of the top engines.
Myth: Meta tags
are the most important factor in search engine rankings.
Fact: Many search
engines (most notably Google) ignore meta tags completely
due to constant abuse by webmasters. The only importance
placed on meta tags these days is actually the meta
description tag, which will appear as the description
for the corresponding page on engines that use inktomi
data (such as MSN). Meta tags are virtually irrelevant
in the ranking algorithms of the top engines- but
many people continue to believe that they are the
only optimization strategy that they need.
Myth: It's impossible
to do search engine optimization in-house.
Fact: It often
is done in-house, and done effectively. This is typically
when a large corporation hires in-house talent that
is largely devoted exclusively to promoting the website.
However, it is unrealistic to expect someone with
many other job functions to do a credible job of SEO.
Much of the skills are acquired through experience-
and it isn't usually desirable to have someone "experimenting"
with the company website (especially considering that
certain techniques can get sites penalized on engines
or banned outright). SEO isn't rocket science, but
it also isn't something that can be learned overnight.
When deciding whether to outsource SEO or do it in
house, it is important to consider the actual costs
involved. Often, when the necessary hours it takes
to pay someone to learn on the job are taken into
account, it is cheaper to outsource (and the results
are almost always better). Only a careful evaluation
of your goals and resources can determine the best
course of action for your company.
Myth: Sites must
be constantly resubmitted to retain rankings.
Fact: This is
a scare tactic popularized by various submission services
and software companies. In fact, it is a waste of
money to pay to have your site resubmitted once it
is already listed in an engine's database. It will
not hurt your rankings to constantly submit (or else
people would submit their competitor's sites to get
them penalized), but it will not help, either.
Myth: Search engine
optimization is not as effective as "traditional"
marketing.
Fact: In
many ways, it is more effective. Companies often spend
countless dollars on direct mail, television and radio
advertising, and bulk email without a second thought.
The common thread with each of these strategies is
that the prospect is "approached" by the
company, and that the company must reach a great number
of people to find a few motivated prospects. On the
other hand, search engines can deliver highly motivated
prospects directly to your website- people who have
already demonstrated, through their use of particular
keyphrases, an interest in your products or services.
Our credits to the source/author of this article:
|
Author: Scott Buresh
Scott Buresh is the CEO of Medium Blue Search Engine Marketing.
He has contributed content to many publications including Building Your Business with Google For Dummies (Wiley, 2004), MarketingProfs, ZDNet, SEO Today, WebProNews, DarwinMag, SiteProNews, ISEDB.com, and Search Engine Guide. Medium Blue,an Atlanta search engine optimization company
, serves local and national clients, including Boston Scientific, DuPont, and Georgia-Pacific. To receive internet marketing articles and search engine news in your email box each month, register for Medium Blue’s newsletter, Out of the Blue.
This article is taken from the Medium blue website.
|
|
|
|